mabango ya kampeni huko harare kablaa ya tshivangirai kuchomoa kutokana na mtimanyongo wa jongwe ambaye inaonekana hata wenzie wameshamchoka na
mabango ya kampeni huko harare kablaa ya tshivangirai kuchomoa kutokana na mtimanyongo wa jongwe ambaye inaonekana hata wenzie wameshamchoka na
Kutokujua thamani ya uhuru ni kutokujua thamani ya maisha.
ReplyDeleteKumbe Jongwe naye ni CCM
ReplyDeletekuna watu wababe humu duniani???sasa wananchi wenyewe wamekuchoka bado mtu kaganda tu adi afie ikulu na miaka yake sijui 85??
ReplyDeletebora uyo mpinzani kajitoa kuokoa roho za raia wasio na hatia wapate maafa,,,sasa sijui atajiita kashinda uchaguzi kwa lipi,,
Jamaa ana sura mbili kwa Wazimbabwe ambazo ni "shujaa" na "adui" sijui ipi itamshinda mwenzie pindi atakaporudi madarakani tena,
ReplyDeleteViongozi wote wa Africa wamebaki njia panda hawajui wasimame wapi maana jamaa anapigana na ukoloni mamboleo akitumia raia wake,na waingereza wanapambana nae kutumia silaha ambayo ni raia wake,patamu hapo!
imebidi hata tanzania ambayo ni moja ya marafiki wakubwa wa mugabe wampashe kuwa hana haki ya kuiminya demokrasia
ReplyDeleteHata katika Chama chake mwenyewe cha ZANU PF kuwa Kiongozi Pekee toka 1980 hadi 2008 hiyo ndiyo Demokrasia?Hakuna Mzimbabwe mwingine mwenye uwezo kuzidi wake aikongoze Chama hicho bali yeye Mugabe?Kama hawezi kudhihirisha Demokrasia ndani ya Chama chake hiyo Demokrasia ya kuiongoza Nchi nzima ataiheshimu wapi?Au baraka ya kupigana porojo tu?Uongozi una kikomo chake kama Uwezo wa Kufikiri ulivyo na kikomo chake,vinginevyo tutakuwa tunamjaribu Mwenyezi Mungu !Hakuna marefu yasiyo na ncha!
ReplyDeleteMugabe aachie ngazi.he is a dectator and a greedy man.another man needs to step out power,that goes out to my man in Uganda too. step out man!
ReplyDeletehuku UK nilipo Mugabe anasemwa vibaya MNO! kwenye vyombo vya habari.i bet wazimbabwe feel bad,because even though hes not a good person,sometimes it is intimidating to read such remarks. extent ya journalism huku ni tofauti sana na Tanzania.huku ni kama mbwa mwenye hasira anaebweka matusi ya ndani.media can destroy your life.Mugabe nakushauri we achia ngazi kama alivyosema anon wa hapo juu 3:59 na uangalia hamsini zako,maana unachukiwa!duh!
ReplyDeletebush kungangnia ruksa! tony blair naye ruksa clinton ruksa mama wa kipakistani na mwanaye ruksa ! niishie wapi? lakini mugabe akingangania kosa! ikulu kutamu waulizeni hao nilowataja hapo juu. dont be hipocrty guys . siku zote mnasema viongozi wa africa wasimame kidete. leo hii mugabe kasimama oh oh ni dictator.hapo ndo ujue ukoloni mamboleo ni mkali kuliko ule wa zama . open your eyes you african we need more mugabe in our continent.
ReplyDeletewe anon 9:50 punga kweli..eti we need more mugabe..we certainly dont need a president who is old and gaunt and wants to stay in power for 20 years!..thats DICTATORSHIP!..get rid of mugabe,zimbabwe!! he is nothing but trouble..do u see how people in his country starve?he eats 3 course meals,his wife goes shopping to milan,paris in the countrys jet plane,but people in zimbabwe are starving..MUGABE!GET OUT!NOW!!!!!!!
ReplyDeletewewe wa June 26 9.50am, unazungumza kuhusu Bush, Clinton na Blair, Bush anaondoka Jan 2009,USA raisi hatawali zaidi ya term 2 - miaka 8 total, ili kuleta damu na uongozi mpya, Mugabe yupo hapa miaka 30 na zaidi sasa, nchi na waZimbabwe wanaumia kimaisha, uchumi na usalama wao. Nashangaa wewe unamgombea Mugabe, Mugabe amefeli kuiongoza nchi, kama watu wote wanampenda huko kwa nini asiruhusu uchagazi wa amani bila ya kutesa na kuuwa watu. MF need to go now.
ReplyDeleteNi aibu kuona viongozi wa Afrika kunga'nga'nia power kiasi hichi bila kujali ubinadamu.
My friend Blair na Clinton waliteremka uongozi wakati wao ulipoisha. Ni sheria za nchi hizo unapewa wakati wa cheo hicho, ukiisha wakati hakuna ubishi mwengine anachaguliwa hata kama yule anayeondoka alikuwa kiongozi mzuri kama alivyokuwa Clinton huko Marikani. Blair aliharakishwa kuondoka kwa ajili ya kumsapoti Bush na Iraq. Please do not misinform watu kama hujui facts.
ATL-USA
Angalia ukweli huu:
ReplyDeleteZakaria: South Africa's president 'should hang his head in shame'
Fareed Zakaria is a preeminent foreign affairs analyst and hosts "Fareed Zakaria: GPS" on CNN Sundays at 1 p.m. ET .
He spoke to CNN about the crisis in Zimbabwe.
Fareed Zakaria says South Africa should be doing a lot more to solve the Zimbabwe crisis.
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Zimbabwe's main opposition party is urging the world to intervene immediately before a mounting political crisis in the country gets even worse. Analyst Fareed Zakaria gives his view of the situation.
CNN: What should we make of the crisis in Zimbabwe?
Zakaria: Robert Mugabe is using every trick in the book -- many of them nasty and brutish -- to stay in power. But what does that mean? Zimbabwe is already under sanctions. Perhaps tighter sanctions will have an effect, but in general, this is an illustration of one of the great frustrations of diplomacy. You can watch an intolerable situation involving great injustice, but still be unable to do that much about it.
CNN: Should military force be an option?
Zakaria: Well, you should never rule anything out, but it's a lousy option. It would arouse strong opposition. And what happens the day after the invasion? You now own Zimbabwe, a country that Mugabe and his regime have run into the ground over the last 30 years. Video Watch victims of beatings in Zimbabwe »
CNN: So could anything work?
Zakaria: The world should try real, foolproof sanctions that are not directed against the country but the regime, the few hundred people at the top. Freeze their bank accounts, make it impossible for them to travel anywhere, revoke the visas of their children who are studying abroad. Let them -- not ordinary Zimbabweans -- pay for Mugabe's crimes.
Don't Miss
* Zimbabwe in Crisis
* Fareed Zakaria's new book
* Fareed Zakaria: GPS
CNN: Should the United States lead on this issue?
Zakaria: No. The U.S. should certainly make its position clear, but it doesn't have the credibility to make the difference. Only one country does -- South Africa. And its president, Thabo Mbeki, has been shamefully quiet about the horrors in Zimbabwe. Mbeki has abdicated his country's natural leadership role in Africa by his cowardice and complicity. Mbeki should hang his head in shame.
advertisement
CNN: The UK has been taking a lead position in condemning Mugabe. ... Is this appropriate, given its history in Zimbabwe?
Zakaria: Absolutely. Britain has long ties with Zimbabwe and knows the country well. I don't think it should be paralyzed by its colonial past. As John Burns of The New York Times says on our show this week, "Zimbabweans aren't stupid, and Africans aren't stupid." Mugabe is trying to play the colonial card against Britain, but it won't work. Britain is doing the right thing.
Zimbabwe | The Truth About Sir Robert Mugabe
ReplyDeleteI have recently returned from the Ngoma Workshop in Koso, Western Uganda. The workshop was made up of artists from all over Africa and it was most interesting to be in East Africa as the Zimbabwean dramatic elections were being played out. Discussions on democratic change were often spoken about around the dinner table. One afternoon, I spoke exclusively to a talented Zimbabwean artist, Stephen Garan'anga on the matter of Robert Mugabe. Being British and open-minded I realised that the English press had/is demonizing Sir Robert Mugabe. Stephen eloquently told me that the issue of modern Zimbabwe lies in the construction of it's Constitution, written on December 12th 1979 - referred to as the Lancaster House Agreement -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancaster_House_Agreement
He spoke of the betrayal of Britain under the leadership of Tony Blair and his Secretary of State for International Development, Clare Short.
I found Stephen's comments most enlightening and searched for an article that echoed Stephen Garan'anga's discussion.
Thank you so much for your true insight into modern day Zimbabwe.
-----
Zimbabwe: Dancing to the tune without knowing why
29 Mar 2007
By Ben Mabula
Source: http://www.ippmedia.com/ipp/guardian/2007/03/29/87292.html
Sometime in the year 2002, the writer of this article went to Harare, where he stayed for a few days and also managed to visit some localities near the capital city of Zimbabwe.
This was precisely at a time when widespread land seizures had taken place in Zimbabwe, to a major outcry from the foreign press, which was understandably, firmly on the side of the white settlers.
Being a daily watcher of news here in Dar es Salaam, I was constantly watching the foreign news correspondents reporting from Zimbabwe on daily basis about the ``total breakdown of law and order in Zimbabwe.``
So while being driven around the nearby countryside, I would persistently ask my hosts as to where the total breakdown of law and order was, as I could see people going around with their day to day business in Zimbabwe in a peaceful manner.
``You know,`` replied one of my hosts, ``these BBC people sometimes exaggerate these things.``
On my last day in Harare, I had an opportunity to have lunch with a friend at Meikles Hotel in Harare. The restaurant was full of customers, most of whom were whites.
I asked a friend of mine about the exodus of white settlers which was being so much reported about.
``You see,`` said the friend, ``when the land seizures began, many whites went to Australia and attempted to settle there. However, most of them have found the going hard and are returning to Zimbabwe in droves.``
I could see that the interaction between the whites and blacks was normal.
I flew back to Dar es Salaam in the late afternoon.
Once at home, I was watching a BBC stringer broadcasting from Harare at 8.00 of the same day.
His report: ``You can sense the tension in Harare, where there is a total breakdown of law and order.``
I had been to Harare on the same day, yet this professional journalist from a civilized society was telling a deliberate lie for consumption by the whole world.
Years later, after the Zimbabwe government had formalized its land reform programme, through which white land owners who owned more than one farm were deprived of the rest and remained only with one farm so as to avail land to the black majority, as white farmers owned over 80percent of arable land and the black population was congested in rocky areas after their ancestors were thrown out from their ancestral land by Cecil Rhodes.
From then onwards, the demonisation of the government of Zimbabwe, especially President Mugabe, began to take root.
The political opposition and the civil society began receiving millions of dollars from their patrons in Britain, who were eager to reverse the land reform drive.
All kinds of bankrolled political activists sprang up and began singing the popular calypso of Mugabe bashing, which continues to be fashionable up to this day.
Many of the people who yearn for freedom and democracy around the globe have been prejudiced by this campaign because most of them have no idea of Zimbabwe’s contemporary history, or whether the whole outcry centres around the issue of land, which is not so simple a matter.
For one to understand Zimbabwe and form a judgement on its current political state, it is vital to go back to the Lancaster House Agreement.
The background to the Lancaster House Agreement was the realization by both Britain and the minority regime of Rhodesia led by Ian Smith that the battleground had been lost to ZANU guerillas, who were now striking targets in Salisbury (now Harare) at will.
The leadership of ZANU was now in the hands of Robert Mugabe, a brilliant and astute strategist, after he was freed from ten years detention without trial for fighting the racist minority rule.
A meeting of Commonwealth Heads of Government which took place in Lusaka from August 1 to 7, 1979 paved way for the belligerent forces in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) to meet in the UK for negotiations.
Indeed, the Lancaster House Conference took place and agreement was reached after 40 plenary sessions.
The three-month conference almost failed to reach agreement due to disagreement on land reform. Mugabe who headed the ZANU delegation under the ZANu umbrella did not trust that a peace deal transfer of land to the majority would take place once he had placed his signature on the dotted line, and time had proved him right.
However, Robert Mugabe, who was the key stumbling block, was eventually pressured to sign by the frontline state leaders, especially Mwalimu Nyerere, who told him to accept political independence first and all would follow.
It was reported then that Mugabe was staying with a British friends during the talks, and he was almost in tears when it became inevitable that he had to sign the agreement without securing a foolproof arrangement for land transfer.
It was said that he even refused to take his supper because he suspected that Britain would renege on the agreement at some stage. Indeed, this is what is happening even now.
So the Lancaster House Agreement was signed on December 21, 1979. The agreement ended white rule under Ian Smith.
The conference was chaired by Lord Carrington, the UK secretary of state for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs.
It was signed between the Patriotic Front consisting of ZAPU and ZANU, and the Zimbabwe Rhodesia Government represented by Bishop Muzorewa and Ian Smith.
The conference reached agreement on the following issues:
*The Independence Constitution
*Arrangements for the pre-independence period.
*A ceasefire agreement
Those who signed the agreement were Lord Carrington, Sir Ian Gilmour, Robert Mugabe, Joshua Nkomo, Bishop Muzorewa and Dr S.C. Mundawarara.
The agreement provided that the Independence Constitution should not be changed for 10 years and 20 percent of Parliamentary seats had to be reserved for whites during that period.
Mugabe, who became the new leader, was tied up by the agreement as the Constitution barred him from undertaking any land reforms during the first ten years. He abided to the Independence Constitution for all those ten years.
To facilitate the Agreement, both the British and American governments offered to buy land from white farmers on willing buyer/willing seller basis for re-distribution to the majority blacks.
This did not happen for all those 10 years. It was only the first phase of the programme in the 1980s which was faintly accomplished after Britain partially funded the settling of 70,000 landless people.
When Tony Blair took over, his government refused to accept its Lancaster House obligations and the foreign cooperation minister Clare Short wrote a no-nonsense letter to the government of Zimbabwe disclaiming any responsibility for funding the land reform.
Mugabe told Britain that he would take over the land by force and this is what he did. Soon after the land seizures began, trade union leaders in Zimbabwe soon became the darling of the British government and took a radical political tone.
These are the ones who formed the purely foreign funded and controlled MDC, which is enjoying full Western media support.
The battle in Zimbabwe is between the old oppressive system of the settlers and those who brought the change through armed struggle.
Several leaders and top advisers of the MDC belonged to the racist Selous Scouts special armed regiment, which was responsible for a lot of atrocities committed against black people, including poisoning wells and infecting communal water sources with viruses of epidemics like cholera.
These are now the heroes of democracy in Zimbabwe and are fighting to bring about regime change by hooks and crooks.
Ian Smith, the renegade who said that no black man would rule Rhodesian in 100 years, is a force behind the so-called civil society in Zimbabwe.
Smith is widely seen by the foreign press as a fighter for democracy in Zimbabwe while Robert Mugabe is the demon, the enemy of the people of Zimbabwe and a man who cannot read the signs of the times!
* SOURCE: Guardian
Posted by African Artists at 08:54 0 comments
mugabe oh mugabe,kapumzike baba!dah!tena akitoka in power,awe under suicidal watch maana wanaweza kumuua..watu wanahasira ohoo
ReplyDeletei m a muslim brother that wants to be a sheike and a leader and a mujaheed and make my ummah the reunited back again befere 2 1months inshallah eshhaduu anna la ilaaha illi lah muhammaad rasula lah
ReplyDelete