Written by Boniface Mhella (PhD.)
The current economic crisis is accompanied by many other crises in different fields of actions. Political leadership being one of them. On the global level it is questionable whether the crisis has brought to an end the global leadership of the USA and it's allies.
Actually in Africa post independence, the new type of leadership of international cooperation is much more needed. For example, the recent 'Harambee' to raise funds for Somalia is an innovative style of cooperation that needs poor African countries, without relying heavily on the benevolence of the West, to act jointly to support poor Somalians by showing sympathy in the fight against poverty and non-governability of the country and region. At the same time, the 15-nations of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) met to address their problems including the problem of the ongoing leadership battles in Zimbabwe and Madagasca.
The summit ended up with the election of President Zuma and President Kikwete to head the SADC’s organ on politics, defence and security. This of course is a demonstration of the region’s affirmation to resolve conflicts in the SADC region.
President Kikwete himself, despite being seen as a leader who can lead negotiation to win many of the African crises, is facing increasing pressure domestically to reduce his international flights and State visits in other countries. Such domestic opposition to his leadership do challenge his regional commitment as he might reduce his international exposure and his engagement in international affairs in order to satisfy the demands of his voters.
Basically President Kikwete has fallen into a "democratic trap": a situation in which a leader is in the serious crisis of confidence from his own domestic voters, in the midst of obvious regional crisis that needs him to play a leading part in negotiations.
Citizens in the democratic countries must understand that the current African regional system does not have effective legal instruments to solve its regional problems. In most cases leaders between themselves are undemocratically chosen to head regional organs without being mandated by their own voters.But above all solutions, leaders must still understand that nothing will be effective than responding to the problems of their people. While participation in Africa affairs, presidents must make serious decision to bring into accountability, transparency and good governance their own governments, together with fighting corruption and ufisadi. Otherwise their own voters will continue to disapprove all of their good efforts in international affairs. As an academician, I see the existence of leaders' 'democratic trap' in Africa as a clear sign of a need to speed up regional integration towards regional federations. While globalisation has brought Africans closer to each other, the regional politics and the way leaders are legitimised has been left unchanged. There is no doubt that the old style of leadership based on national identity is becoming no longer very effective in africa yet leaders are slow in reforming the political systems of africa to adapt new changes.
What else do we expect from such a system if not the deepening of democratic trap?


umetoa mchango mzuri mkuu mimi napenda kuongeza umefika sasa wakati waafrika chini ya kikwete na zuma waanze kukoromea pia hao watu wa mataifa mabepari na kina NATO. wanakuja afrika na wanamwaga maela tuu kwa magaidi badala ya kusaidia sehemu zinazoitaji zaidi misaada na mpaka wanakuwa kero kama wanavyolipualibya na watu watunusia wakiuliwa hivihivi na wao baada ya kwenda kusaidia huko
ReplyDeleteJe mbona hukunuku watafiti wengine? Ua wewe ndie wa kwanza kusema hayo!
ReplyDeleteWewe namba anony 2..hii ni blog hicho alichoweka hapo Dr. Boniface kinaitwa 'Abstract'wasaliana naye atakupa ukurusa wenye "references".
ReplyDeleteAsante sana Dr.Boniface:Mimi si mtalaam sana wa haya masuala nitajaribu kutumia DS ya pale mlimani.Tuna tatizo jingine Afrika Afrika limejificha kuna nchi zilizotawaliwa na mfaransa(Francophone) na zile zilizotawaliwa na Mwingereza(Anglo-phone).Ufaransa bado inazitawala hizi nchi pamoja na kutawala pesa(FCFA) ya nchi hizi za kifaransa,nchi ya iliyotawaliwa na mfaransa ikigoma kutumia pesa hii(FCFA)'inakiona cha moto'.Rafiki yangu kutoka Ghana alikuwa ananisimulia anasikitika kwamba wao(nchi za Afrika Magh.) wana umoja wa nchi za Magharibi(ECOWAS?)lakini ndani yake nchi kifaransa zina umoja wao mwingine!!Nigeria na ghana ni Anglo-phone
David V
Can you give any example of a leader who has attended international affairs while his presidency at home is "calm"?!. I dont think this has ever happened. At any one point in each country's presidency, there are competing challenges which warrants questioning of the presidency's involvement in international affairs. Not only for Kikwete; Nyerere, Mwinyi, Mkapa, Mandela, Clinton, etc, you name them! There is nothing like "Democratic Trap" - questioning legitimacy and social contract is a characteristic of any presidency in the world and this is what the formulators of foreigh policy have to deal with as they balance domestic and foreign priorities. What makes it different now is the vibrant electronic media which tend either to make the old problems new or magnify them....
ReplyDeleteContributor (BA).
Is the anonymous Contributor (BA) above pro or against the emotion given by Dr. Boniface? He seems to argue without reading well the abstract. I think Dr. Mhella is suggesting that we must re-establish that missing trust between Citizens and their Presidents during this period of economic hardship. Africans must be happy when their leaders are asked to head regional offices. This is why Dr. Boniface thinks the 'democratic trap' must not be alllow to deepen into a vicious cycle.
ReplyDeleteMimi kwa kweli namuunga mkono Dr. Boniface kwanza kwa kuraise hii issue ambayo imeanza kuwa sugu nchini Tanzania.Ujue Tanzania ni nchi moja nzuri sana ambayo inaharibiwa na wale wachache waliomo kwenye madaraka. Mfano mzuri ameutoa kuwa Tanzania sasa kwa kweli hali ya kiuchumu na kijamii tunarudi nyuma kwa kasi sana. Tunamatatizo chungu mbovu. Haya yote tuliambiwa mkitupa kura chama chetu basi tutafanya ili na lile, ujue hizi ni story za politicians ambazo ni danganya toto tu! Mimi kama Mtanzania namasikitiko makubwa sana kusema kwamba kwa mwendo wa sasa Tanzania itakuwa nchi ya mwisho duniani.yaani kwenye karne ya 21 kweli Tanzania bado tunakaa bila umeme kwa masaa yote hayo? au tunapa mgao sijui wa maji!!
ReplyDeletePlus mheshimiwa apunguze safari zisizokuwa na mpangoo!! maana anakuwa na delegation kubwa sana hizo hela aziinvest kwenye matatizo ya nyumbani!!!
Mkereketwa wa TZ
I'm the BA guy. I'm not pro or against the article but my point is the use of "democratic trap" in connection to Tanzaniani's foreign involvement is far fetched. These are responsibilities of any government, they decide where to put their priorities, if not on this then on that and these are not democratic traps. These are matters or setting prioritis depending on what you have in your budget; either the president take the the diplomatic shuttles of the money do somewhere else. These are matters of choices.IF THE PRESIDENT STOPS THESE ENGAGEMENTS DOES IT MEAN THAT DEMOCRACY IN TANZANIA WILL BE "UNTRAPPED"?. The real democratic traps have to do with transparency, corruption and above all constitutional reforms.Democratic trap has to do with something systemic. Connecting foreign engagements with democratic trap is far fetched...
ReplyDeleteContributor (BA)
You say:
ReplyDeleteBasically President Kikwete has fallen into a "democratic trap": A situation in which a leader is in a serious crisis of confidence from his own domestic voters, in the midst of obvious regional crisis that needs him to play a leading part in negotiations."
Is this how you define democratic trap? It is a wrong definition
Contributor BA.
Dear Mdau BA,
ReplyDeleteThe word "democratic trap" is my own invention. And I have defined it as a situation in which a leader is in the serious crisis of confidence from his own domestic voters, in the midst of obvious regional crisis that needs him to play a leading part in negotiations. I am not sure if you have the same definition in your mind. Kama unayo definition tofauti naomba uiseme.
Nakukumbusha tu kuwa kwa mtu ambaye anajua dynamic theories atakuwa anajua neno ' trap' linamaana gani. have you ever heard about the word 'poverty trap' for example? Most development economists do use these terminologies to explain various dynamic situations that risks to fall into either vicious or virtuous cycle. What i did is to apply the theory to explain the current political situation. I hope it will be clear to you by now.
Boniface
If you made your own definition of the term then thats fine. I used it the way it is applied in the academic milieu. In this case I understand you meant the leader has "domestic and foreign priorities that may be conflicting". Its interesting however how you try to link "domestic and foreign priorities that may be conflicting" with "democratic trap"
ReplyDeleteContributor
Dear Contributor BA.
ReplyDeleteNaomba unipe definition unayoijua wewe ya democratic trap. Hilo tu ningependa kusikia. Asante