JK akikata utepe kuzindua rasmi hoteli ya Kiromo View iliyo nje kidogo ya mji wa Bagamoyo leo
JK akitembezwa kuangalia hoteli ya Kiromo View baada ya kuizindua. Anayempa amelezo ni Mkurugenzi Mtendaji wa hoteli hiyo, Bw. James Mujunamgoma. Kushoto ni waziri utalii na maliasili Mh. Shamsa Selengia Mwangunga, akifuatiwa na mkuu wa mkoa wa Pwani Dk Christine Ishengoma
Heeh! WADAU tusaidiane mawazo kidogo..
ReplyDeleteUle moto wa zile Hotel pale Bagamoyo, ilikuwa ni maandalizi ya kupisha UFUNGUZI wa hii hotel mpya anayoifungua Muheshimiwa hapo pichani????
mhhhh! interesting....
ReplyDeleteMAMA SHAMSA JITAHIDI SANA KWA SABABU WAKENYA WANATUSHINDA SANA KWA KUITANGAZA NCHI YAO KIUTALII. WANATANGAZA HATA MLIMA KILI NI WAO,TANZANIGHT ZINATOKA KWAO. SASA MAMA USIKALIE KUFUNGUA MAHOTELI TU UTANGAZE UTAALII.TUNA VITU VINGI KUPITA (KENYA) WATANI WETU WAJADI.KAZANA DADA.
ReplyDeleteWIZI MTUPU
ReplyDeleteHuyo Bodigadi wa JK nampenda
ReplyDeleteDuh Inawezekana ndugu yangu maana hat mimi nilikuwa najiuliza hii imekaaje?
ReplyDeletebongo bwana!!!
halafu kwa kusingizia{mambo ya mungu bwana tutafanyaje?}maana mpaka leo hatujaambiwa zile hotel ilikuwaje zikawaka?
mdau jp
Anon wa kwanza kabisa hapo juu, jibu ni hapana. Ila ile keep left pale kando ya Liumba Towers imetegwa mahsusi kwa ajili ya kumdhuru rais siku akipita njia hiyo kwenda/kutoka Ikulu.
ReplyDeleteHii hotel ni ya mtu binafsi, serikali au nani? Kumbe nami nikiwa nayo au nina kamradi kangu je naweza muita rais kuja kuzindua au ndo mpaka niwe nani hiiii!!???
ReplyDeletemdadisi umedadisi, ni kweli!
ReplyDeletefagia njia nipite!
mh!
why, why kikwete ndie awe mgeni rasmi kufungua hii hoteli ya kitalii?
ReplyDeletehoteli inamilikiwa na serikali au ni ya mtu binafsi?
kama ni ya serikali, hakuna viongozi wa wizara ya utalii ambao wangefanya kazi hiyo? why kikwete what sort of protocol inayoonekana hapa.
hii inaonyesha jinsi gani nchi yetu ilivyotawaliwa na rushwa!
haya ndiyo mambo yanayowaumiza walalahoi wanaolazimishwa kulipa umeme kwa aliji ya kuwanufaisha wachache; akina DOWANS, IPTL. SONGAS na makampuni mengine yanayokula hela hata hayajasajiliwa!
mimi si mtembeleaji wa blog hii lakini ningependa nitoe maoni yangu kuhusu hii serikali na ufisadi wao.
hivi ni kwa nini TANESCO inalazimishwa kuilipa ITPL sh.234m kwa siku kwa umeme ambao haaupatikani kama mkataba unavyodai? ( sawa na sh 3.4bln kwa mwezi)
bilioni 3.4 kwa mwezi kwa ajili ya kuzalisha umeme kutokana na mtaambo chakavu wa MSD! Tena kwa mkataba wa miaka 20 jamani!
bado kuna kina RICHMOND/DOWANS wanaolipwa shs milioni 158/=, SONGAS shs 264m/= kwa siku, APR(76M/=) AGRECO shs62m/=...jamani kwa siku kwa huduma isiyopatikana!
tumedokezwa kuna kampuni ya kiwira nayo inajilambia mamilioni wakato power pull east africa haijazaliwa na inakula chake! leo tunapita kujisifu eti kikwete yuko makini na mafisadi. huu si ufisadi?
sina ubaya na kikwete lakini najionea huruma mimi, ndugu, jamaa na marafiki jinsi tunavyonyonywa wakati nchi hii imepiganiwa na mababu zetu...kisa; TUONDOKANE NA UNYONYAJI WA WAVAMIZI (WAZUNGU).
kumbe sisi wenyewe ni wanyonyaji wabaya na tusio na haya kuliko hata hao waliokuwa wakitunyonya kwa kuendeleza nchi zao.
tanzania inasifika sana kwa kuwa madini, utalii mzuri na ni moja kati ya nchi yenye kulinda amani.
lakini sifa zote hizo hazitajwi na mtu au mgeni yeyote aliwahi kufika huko zaidi ya RUSHWA ni moja kati ya kitu muhimu cha kufanikisha maisha yako TANZANIA!
RUSHWA! WHY RUSHWA NOW! tuna chombo kinachoitwa TAKUKURU na huku bado watu wanajifaisha tena watu wa ngazi zza juu serikalini. nani anayefaidika na nani anayeumia kama siyo malalahoi!
hakuna aneyekemea na kila mmoja akifunua mdomo...ah bora angekuwa nyerere haya yote ya EPA, DOWANS yasingetokea.
kwani hakuyakemea hayo na hata kumpiga vita LOWASSA asigombee URAIS! Anayajua sana na aliyakemea lakini hakuna aliyetaka kusikia.
watanzania tukae tujiulize kwa nini wawekezaji wa KWELI wanaikimbia nchi na badala yake tumezungukwa na WATOA RUSHWA ili kujinuisha wao wenyewe na walio wachache?
siwezi kuzungumzia suala la kutoweka kwa hoteli kama SHERATON na kuitwa majina mbalimbali tangu ilipojengwa. lakini tukumbuke kwamba wenye mahoteli hayo wanalinda heshima zao na kuhofia yasijekuwakuta kama SIR STANFORD.
yapo mambo kibao ya kuzungumzia juu ya serikali hii na nina mengi yanayowagusa walalahoi kama mimi. nikipata muda nitarudi tena kwani sitaki kuwachosha.
mlalahoi hana muda wa kusoma mada ndefu kama risala au hotuba.
baadaye!
Wacheni fitna, wapeni moyo wazalendo wawekeze.
ReplyDeleteJIBU KWA ANON WA April 12, 2009 10:54 PM.
ReplyDelete1.Hembu juilize kwa nini Gwantanamo Bay ni sehemu ya cuba lakini inamilikiwa na wamarekani.
2.Kwanini afrika iliwasamehe wazungu baada ya kututawala na kutuharibia uchumi wetu na maisha kwa ujumla na sasa hivi tunawaita mapartner kataika kuendleleza uchumi wetu
3.Kwa nini SA mandela aliamua kuwa na truth and reconciliation thing badala ya kutafuta justice thru court of law
Sioni kosa kwa rais kufungua hiyo hotel. Unamkumbuka aliyefungua hotel ya kilimanjaro kempinsk?
Watanzania wenzangu inabidi tuwe marealistic instead ya kuwa watu wa kubwabwaja. mfano rahisi kabisa katika masuala ya legal proceeding ni kama ishu ya ze commrdy na EATV. sisi watu wa kawaida tunaweza kuona kuwa ze comedi walionewa lakini it is other way around inapokuja masula ya kisheria.
MDAU WAAPRIL 13 3:56 UNAPOTOA KASHFA YA KUDAI WATU WANABWABWAJA WAKATI WANA UCHUNGU NA NCHI YAO, NI BORA UNGEFUNGA BAKULI LAKO KWA SABABU HUENDA NI MMOJA WA WATU EPA AU ZUMBUKUKU ULIMWENGU UKO HUKU.
ReplyDeleteHUWEZI KULETA MAMBO YA GITMO HERE WAKATI WATU WANAZUNGUMZIA KASHFA ZA RUSHWA ZINAVYOANGUSHA NCHI YETU.
WATOA MISAADA KULISHA BAJETI YETU (UK £150M) WANA UCHUNGU WAKATI KUNA WATU WACHACHE KAMA WEWE UNAKUJA NA MENO JUU BILA KUJUA UTAMKALO.
KAMA UNA MUDA SOMA MADA HII ILIYOKUWA IKICHAANGWA KWENYE BUNGE LA UK NDIPO UTAPOTAMBUA KILA PENNY YA MTOA KODI INAVYOHISABIKA NA WANAVYOTAKA ITUMIKE...SIYO WIZI TU.
"It is worth bearing in mind that the decision to purchase the equipment was made by the Tanzanian Government. Foreign Minister Kikwete at the time said:
“Our engineers prescribed the system which we required. We put the contract out to tender, four companies competed and we got BAe Systems delivering to our specification. This is the system we wanted.”
The Tanzania case did highlight a number of issues.
Norman Lamb: The argument is that criterion 8 should have ruled out the sale of the system because it seriously hampers the sustainable development of the country. I would argue that for a country heavily in debt, that must be the case, but if the right hon. Gentleman argues to the contrary, is he saying that criterion 8 needs to be amended? Surely the conclusion must be that it is wrong to grant an export licence for the sale of an inappropriate system that was not fit for purpose.
In February 2002, the UK decided to withhold £10 million in budget support from Tanzania because of concerns about the purchase. In May, the second ICAO report raised further concerns about value for money and the balance between civilian and military use.
In July 2002, the then Secretary of State for International Development, the right hon. Member for Birmingham, Ladywood (Clare Short), met President Mkapa, who outlined the steps taken by the Government of Tanzania to improve financial management, and at that point it was decided to continue to provide budget support. The sale went ahead and the system was installed. It continues to operate today, although the Government of Tanzania subsequently decided not to proceed with the purchase of the second phase of the system.
Mr. Ellwood: I know that I am referring to events that did not happen on his watch, but is the Secretary of State aware of the size of the Tanzanian air force? There are nine aeroplanes—six MiG-1s and three MiG-17s—and 10 Bell Huey helicopters. What on earth were the Government doing, giving export orders to Tanzania and selling it a civil/military-operation air traffic control system that it did not need, and that was four times too expensive, and four times larger than was required?
Pete Wishart: What is the Secretary of State’s view of the so-called middlemen—Mr. Vithlani and Mr. Somaiya—who are rumoured to have paid up to $12 million into a Swiss bank account as part of the deal?
We are concerned that if those circumstances were to be repeated, there is little doubt that public support for the British international development agenda, which the Secretary of State and I hold dear, could be seriously eroded and undermined. I remind the House of the relevant facts. In 2001, the British Government were asked to consider applications for export licences for the sale to the Tanzanian Government of an air traffic control system. The system cost £28 million and the heavily indebted Tanzanian Government took on more debt to secure it. The International Civil Aviation Organisation said that the system was “not adequate and too expensive for civil purposes”.
The International Monetary Fund told the Prime Minister that it was very concerned about the impact of the purchase on Tanzania’s external debt burden. The sale was opposed by leaders of Tanzanian civil society, who advised the Prime Minister that it was “too expensive” and “murky”. In Britain, a wide spectrum of international development organisations were completely opposed to the deal. Oxfam said that the deal was “outrageous” and
“a complete waste of money”.
Mr. Mitchell: As the right hon. Gentleman will well know, its replacement had the full support of this side of the House, so I do not see the relevance of that to the case that I am making.
The contract was opposed by the World Bank, which argued compellingly that the £28 million system was far “too expensive” and was outdated, and that a satisfactory system could have been secured for a fraction of the price.
It is pretty ludicrous to expect Tanzania to be spending £28 million on a military air traffic control system it does not need. There are perfectly good civilian air traffic control systems that would cost considerably less.”
Mr. Mitchell: The hon. Lady makes an interesting point about Saudi Arabia, but that is not the subject of the debate.
The Tanzanian context of the deal cannot be ignored. Tanzania is one of the poorest countries in the world. In 2001, more than half the population lived in severe poverty. Life expectancy at birth was 45 years. Primary school enrolment was 67 per cent. Some 2 million people were living with HIV/AIDS. Tanzania had a national debt of $5.4 billion. It had recently received debt relief from the World Bank and the IMF through the initiative for heavily indebted poor countries. For a long time, Britain has been a major donor. In 2000-01, we gave £111 million—£35 million of which was in direct budget support. In handing over that money, British taxpayers wanted, and Tanzania needed, every possible penny to be spent on measures to promote development, such as building basic health and education systems and tackling killer diseases. According to Oxfam, £28 million could have provided basic health care for 2 million people or an education for 3.5 million children.
Mr. Mitchell: The hon. Gentleman knows very well that we have strongly supported giving British aid to Tanzania. However, it is right for the House to take account of the fact that the deal caused the Tanzanian Government to incur a debt of some £28 million. That debt must be paid back at the same time that the UK taxpayer is giving aid to Tanzania. Although the two payments are not directly related, I am making an important point about the way in which the debt was contracted, given the importance of having confidence in the system of budgetary support.
HUU SI MWISHO NA NAJUA MICHUZI HUENDA AITOE INGAWA TUNAONA HUTUBA NDEFU ZA KINA MASHAKA HUCHAPISHWA HUMU NA WATU HUCHANGIA PIA.
KWA HIYO UKIONA MTU ANASHUKU JINSI ANAYEJIITA MPINGA RUSHWA WAKATI HUKU IKIENDELZWA, HUO NI UNAFIKI.#
KESI YA RADAR HAIWEZI KUUNGURUMA KWANI INAWAHUSHISHA VIGOGO WENGI WALIO NA WASIO MADARAKANI.
NI KASHFA INAYOIHUSISHA PIA SERIKALI YA UK KWA KUTOA KIBALI KWA NCHI KUUZIWA RADAR KUTOKANA NA MKOPO WA DOLA MILIONI 40. NYINGINE ZIMEENDA WAPI?
baadaye
WE jamaa unaleta mambo ya ze comedy na ishu ya kikwete humu kufungua mgahawa na guantanamo bay afrika kusini, mbona sielewi una maana gani.
ReplyDeleterekebisha lugha halafu rudi tena humu. unaoenekana mchovu fulani usiyejua utendalo.
mmiliki wa hoteli jina kapuni, ujenzi ulianza 2005, ina vyumba 128, kumbi mikutano saba zenye uwezo wa kubeba watu 700 kwa wakati mmoj.
ReplyDeleteGHARAMA HADI SASA NI SHS BILIONI SABA (7,000,000,000)
Wewe Tarehe April 11, 2009 8:26 PM, Mtoa Maoni: Anonymous
ReplyDeleteUlisema "Huyo Bodigadi wa JK nampenda"
Huyu sio Bodigadi wa JK, yeye anaitwa Mpambe wa Raisi. Kazi yake ni kumbebea JK mizigo na makaratasi yake, hotuba na etc, hakuna kingine zaidi ya hiyo. Mabodigadi huwezi kuwaona hapo
e bwanaaaa eee. kumbe nd'o mana kesi ya radar inakufa kinyemela. duh we unayejiita baadaye lazima utakuwa mtu wa karibu na wazito maana yaliyozongumzwa humu, balaaaa.
ReplyDeletekumbe jamaa wamelazimisha radar ambayo kifedha hatuna uwezo nayo, wamekataa ushauri wa IMF, na OXFAM wanadai hili dili linanuka RUSHWA. duh, umeniamsha ndugu yangu AKINA CHENGE wapo wengi. silali leo na mimi najiita-baadaye!
Nimerudi,
ReplyDeleteWatanzania inabidi tuwe na uwezo mkubwa wa kuelewa vitu accademically na kuweza kurelate na mazingira la sivyo tutakuwa kila siku tunamention matatizo yale yale kila siku bila kusonga mbele.
Siku hizi kuna watu wengi wamevaa miwani ya uchungu wa nchi hii na wanasimama mbele ya watu na kuargue kwamba wao ndio wazalendo na wanaitakia mema nchii hii. Mfano wao ni wale maaskofu wa DECI; juzi kwenye kipindi cha Star TV asubuhi waling'ang'na kwamba DECI ndo mkombozi wa wanyonge na serikali inawaonea, nao vile vile hawakusita kumention mambo yale yale sijui ufisadi blah blah blah ili Kujustify DECI. watu kama hawa ndo Obama anawaita wanaishi in the wrong side of history.
Watanzania tunashindwa kutofautisha blah blah za mtaani na legal proceedings
Kwa kuoredhesha matatizo na ku taint facts hakutaisaidia nchi. sana sana tu mtaendelea kubwabwaja.
BTW mie sio fisadi. I leave within my means by working hard for less. na niko realistic katika masuala ya maisha.
kwwko nimerudi;
ReplyDeleteunaongea pointless na wala hauko kwenye mada niliyozungumzia. deci got nothing to do with radar, epa, downsa, iptl. hao kama ni matapeli ni wao wanaochukua fedha kwa wananchi
hapa nazungumzia watu wanaotumia madaraka ya waliowachagua na kujifanya mambo kienyeji kwa faida yao wenyewe.
unapozungumzuia mambo ya legal proceeding, uk siyo wapumbavu kulipeleka suala la radar kwenye kitengo cha serious fraud office.
kwani wao inawahusu nini na kama radar iliuzwa na kununuliwa na wabongo wenyewe, wabunge wa uk kwa nini walitumia muda wao kulijadili suala hili bungeni na kutaka lipatiwe jibu.
tanzania nchi huru. ina haki ya kufanya itakavyo. lakini kama kuna kitu ambacho kinawagusa wanaotoa fedha za kutulisha ukiwemo na wewe mwenyewe, wana kila haki kutaka kujua $12 milioni zilizo kwenye swiss bank zimeibwa kwenye dili hilo la radar kwa manufaa ya wachache.
wanauliza, kwa nini nchi kama tz yenye madeni makubwa, iruhusiwe kupewa mkopo wa milioni 40 na barclays bank kununua radar ambayo haiendani na mahitaji ya nchi huku imf wakidai kuwa, wangeweza kunua sehemu nyingine kwa bei nafuu zaidi.
kwa nini wamelazimisha deal hilo lipite huku uk ilikataa mara ya kwanza kwa sababu mbalimbali kama umesoma vizuri hayo mabishano ya bunge la uk.
ununuzi wa radar ambayo haina uwezo na imepingwa na wataalam. haikufaa lakini wamelazimisha mkopo wa dola mioni 40 kati ya hizo 12 zimeishia kwa kina cover up somaiya.
walipa kodi wa uk wanaoisadia tanzania wameliona hilo na wanataka kujua kwa nini deal hilo liliendelea.
hiyo ni moja tu kati mengi yanayowaumiza vichwa wa tz.
iptl inazalisha umeme kwa machine za msd badala ya ssd kama walivyokubaliana na tanesco(kivuli) kwa mkatba wa miaka 20 huku wakilipwa shs 234m kwa siku...kwa siku imagine.
huo mtambo una gharimu kiasi gani kiasi tanesco kushindwa kiasi hicho cha fedha? kama wanaweza kulipa 234m kwa siku (sawa na bilioni 3.4 kwa mwezi) hakuna benki yoyote ambayo ingekaata kutoa mkopo kwa tanesco na kununua hiyo ssd au msd machine kuzalisha umeme!
nani anayenufaika na malipo hayo na nani anayeumia kuhakikisha malipo hayo yanalipwa kila mwezi kulingana na mkataba.
binafsi nililetewa bili ya umeme ya shilingi 5k ya mwezi na tanesco huku nikiwa sina kiwanda wala machine inayoweza kunyonya umeme kiasi hicho.
nimedai na kupinga kodi hiyo na hata kutishia kwenda mahakamani kutaka kujua hiyo shs 5k imetoka wapi.
hujui walalahoi wanalipa umeme kiasi kwa siku. maji, hospitali hazina dawa. walimu hawalipiwi mishahara huku shule za binafsi zikijaa kama utitiri. nani waanzishao hizo shule kama siyo mafisadi.
siwezi kukupa faida nyingi wakati unaonekana kufurahia au kutokuwa na sauti kwa kila kinachofanywa na mafisadi huku wakinyonya nchi kwa manufaa yao.
hujui kitu na utaendelea kuwa hivyo hivyo kula,kunya,kulala. bado una ile dhana ya hofu na woga wa kutoyakemea maovu huku waliopita kuomba kura, wakifanya kinyume na yale walioyokuwa wakiyahubiri walipokuwa wanaomba kura.
kama ungekuwa angalau na kiji- idea ungekuwa unaangalia jinsi gani walipa kodi wa uk wanaovyoionyesha serikali yao kila ufikapo uchaguzi mdogo wa serikali za mitaa au chaguzi nyingine. watu wana msimamo siyo mtu kama wewe ulibweteka na kuongea uoza.
kaa na legaL PROCEEDING yako siju unachozungumza kitu gani.
kwani hao wa cedi hakuna legal proceeding dhidi yao mbona umewataja.
baadaye!